https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260575 The High Court of Madras held that directing the petitioner to pay EDD equivalent to 5% of the assessable value after setting aside the original order was inappropriate. The Court emphasized the need for fair adjudication without undue influence, leading to the deletion of the order to pay EDD. Despite the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under Section 129(A) of the Customs Act, the Court intervened to ensure a just determination of the issue at hand and directed a reconsideration while giving a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260575 The High Court of Madras held that directing the petitioner to pay EDD equivalent to 5% of the assessable value after setting aside the original order was inappropriate. The Court emphasized the need for fair adjudication without undue influence, leading to the deletion of the order to pay EDD. Despite the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under Section 129(A) of the Customs Act, the Court intervened to ensure a just determination of the issue at hand and directed a reconsideration while giving a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260575