<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 480 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order. It found that the land was agricultural, located beyond the specified distance from the Municipal Corporation limits, and the transaction was not deemed an adventure in the nature of trade. Consequently, the profit from the land sale was not taxable as capital gains, aligning with a previous case with similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 480 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order. It found that the land was agricultural, located beyond the specified distance from the Municipal Corporation limits, and the transaction was not deemed an adventure in the nature of trade. Consequently, the profit from the land sale was not taxable as capital gains, aligning with a previous case with similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>