<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 479 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the quashing of reassessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 1999-00. The CIT(A) found the reassessment not in accordance with the law, citing legal precedents and previous court judgments. The reassessment was based on issues already resolved in favor of the assessee, leading to the Tribunal confirming the decision to quash the reassessment. The importance of legal procedures and adherence to the law in reassessment proceedings was emphasized in the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:15:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 479 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the quashing of reassessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 1999-00. The CIT(A) found the reassessment not in accordance with the law, citing legal precedents and previous court judgments. The reassessment was based on issues already resolved in favor of the assessee, leading to the Tribunal confirming the decision to quash the reassessment. The importance of legal procedures and adherence to the law in reassessment proceedings was emphasized in the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>