https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260551 The court held that the participation of the Presenting Officer as a witness in a domestic enquiry does not automatically invalidate the proceedings unless it results in actual prejudice to the employee. The court emphasized that the burden of proving such prejudice lies with the employee and that procedural deviations must demonstrate real, substantial prejudice affecting the employee's legal rights. The case was remanded for further proceedings based on this ruling. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:28:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260551 The court held that the participation of the Presenting Officer as a witness in a domestic enquiry does not automatically invalidate the proceedings unless it results in actual prejudice to the employee. The court emphasized that the burden of proving such prejudice lies with the employee and that procedural deviations must demonstrate real, substantial prejudice affecting the employee's legal rights. The case was remanded for further proceedings based on this ruling. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260551