https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170797 The appeal was allowed as the Division Bench condoned the delay, making it maintainable despite procedural challenges. The dismissal order was upheld as the workman admitted facts and did not demonstrate prejudice from procedural irregularities. The Court found no valid irregularities in the domestic enquiry and rejected the grant of back wages due to the workman's suspension period. The Tribunal's award was quashed, the writ petition allowed, and the issue of back wages deemed irrelevant. No costs were ordered in the disposition of the appeal. en-us Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:41:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170797 The appeal was allowed as the Division Bench condoned the delay, making it maintainable despite procedural challenges. The dismissal order was upheld as the workman admitted facts and did not demonstrate prejudice from procedural irregularities. The Court found no valid irregularities in the domestic enquiry and rejected the grant of back wages due to the workman's suspension period. The Tribunal's award was quashed, the writ petition allowed, and the issue of back wages deemed irrelevant. No costs were ordered in the disposition of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170797