<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules: Missing PAN Numbers Alone Can&#039;t Discredit Assessee&#039;s Explanation for Purchases u/s 69C.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23348</link>
    <description>Bogus purchases - Additions u/s 69C - assessee has not provided PAN No. of the parties - This cannot be the sole reason for disbelieving the explanation of the assessee, when the payments have been made by cheque duly reflected in the bank statement of the assessee - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:06:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules: Missing PAN Numbers Alone Can&#039;t Discredit Assessee&#039;s Explanation for Purchases u/s 69C.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23348</link>
      <description>Bogus purchases - Additions u/s 69C - assessee has not provided PAN No. of the parties - This cannot be the sole reason for disbelieving the explanation of the assessee, when the payments have been made by cheque duly reflected in the bank statement of the assessee - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:06:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>