<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 472 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260547</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the proviso to Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1994, affirmed the jurisdiction of the appellate authority to impose time limits on filing appeals, and rejected the use of Article 226 powers to condone delay in filing appeals based on established legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 472 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260547</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the proviso to Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1994, affirmed the jurisdiction of the appellate authority to impose time limits on filing appeals, and rejected the use of Article 226 powers to condone delay in filing appeals based on established legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>