https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170791 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is not excluded from correcting a Labour Court's preliminary finding on a domestic enquiry where that finding is legally unsustainable. The High Court may interfere on jurisdictional or legal grounds, even though industrial adjudication should ordinarily avoid delay. On the merits, charges that are specific and clear are not vague merely because their sufficiency is disputed, and a witness acting as presenting officer does not vitiate the enquiry absent shown prejudice. A prior opportunity to explain the charges was not mandatory on the pleaded facts, so the finding of defective enquiries was set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration on validity and consequential issues. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:01:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170791 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is not excluded from correcting a Labour Court's preliminary finding on a domestic enquiry where that finding is legally unsustainable. The High Court may interfere on jurisdictional or legal grounds, even though industrial adjudication should ordinarily avoid delay. On the merits, charges that are specific and clear are not vague merely because their sufficiency is disputed, and a witness acting as presenting officer does not vitiate the enquiry absent shown prejudice. A prior opportunity to explain the charges was not mandatory on the pleaded facts, so the finding of defective enquiries was set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration on validity and consequential issues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170791