<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 427 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260502</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing plantation expenditures as revenue expenditure under Section 37, emphasizing the business purpose and environmental preservation aspect. Additionally, the Court affirmed the classification of Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) payments as revenue expenditure, based on commercial expediency and business purposes, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 427 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260502</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing plantation expenditures as revenue expenditure under Section 37, emphasizing the business purpose and environmental preservation aspect. Additionally, the Court affirmed the classification of Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) payments as revenue expenditure, based on commercial expediency and business purposes, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>