<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the arranger&#039;s fee paid to HSBC, Hong Kong is not taxable as interest income under section 2(28A) or as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source under section 195. The appeal was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the arranger&#039;s fee paid to HSBC, Hong Kong is not taxable as interest income under section 2(28A) or as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source under section 195. The appeal was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>