https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170779 In an interim stay application concerning valuation of physician samples manufactured on a job-work basis, the tribunal noted the prima facie relevance of Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 and the fact that the goods were cleared without MRP affixation. The appellant failed to make out a strong case on merits, and the financial hardship plea was found insufficient to justify complete waiver of the pre-deposit. The appellant was therefore required to pre-deposit the entire differential duty within the time granted, while waiver of pre-deposit was allowed only in respect of interest and penalty subject to compliance. en-us Mon, 27 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:32:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170779 In an interim stay application concerning valuation of physician samples manufactured on a job-work basis, the tribunal noted the prima facie relevance of Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 and the fact that the goods were cleared without MRP affixation. The appellant failed to make out a strong case on merits, and the financial hardship plea was found insufficient to justify complete waiver of the pre-deposit. The appellant was therefore required to pre-deposit the entire differential duty within the time granted, while waiver of pre-deposit was allowed only in respect of interest and penalty subject to compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170779