<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 876 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the debatable nature of the additions upheld by the Tribunal and the admission of substantial questions of law by the High Court, indicating that the penalties were not warranted in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 876 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the debatable nature of the additions upheld by the Tribunal and the admission of substantial questions of law by the High Court, indicating that the penalties were not warranted in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>