<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 404 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the electricity sent to the power grid for synchronization and returned to the factory for manufacturing did not require reversal of CENVAT Credit. The arrangement fell within Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The demand for credit reversal was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 404 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the electricity sent to the power grid for synchronization and returned to the factory for manufacturing did not require reversal of CENVAT Credit. The arrangement fell within Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The demand for credit reversal was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>