https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260478 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the demand beyond one year from the date of clearance is not sustainable under the extended period of limitation, citing settled law and precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the demand within the period of limitation cannot be upheld based on the doctrine of revenue neutrality, referencing specific judgments from the Hon'ble Supreme Court. As a result, the appeal filed by the Appellant was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260478 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the demand beyond one year from the date of clearance is not sustainable under the extended period of limitation, citing settled law and precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the demand within the period of limitation cannot be upheld based on the doctrine of revenue neutrality, referencing specific judgments from the Hon'ble Supreme Court. As a result, the appeal filed by the Appellant was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260478