<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 401 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Public Sector Undertaking providing telecommunication services, concluding that their assembly, installation, and commissioning of switching systems, power plants, and inverters did not amount to manufacturing under the Central Excise Act. The decision was based on the finding that no new distinct commodity emerged post-installation, aligning with previous tribunal decisions and industry practices. The Tribunal set aside duty demands and penalties imposed by the Department, emphasizing the significance of technical descriptions, industry norms, and legal precedents in determining duty liability for manufacturing activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 401 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Public Sector Undertaking providing telecommunication services, concluding that their assembly, installation, and commissioning of switching systems, power plants, and inverters did not amount to manufacturing under the Central Excise Act. The decision was based on the finding that no new distinct commodity emerged post-installation, aligning with previous tribunal decisions and industry practices. The Tribunal set aside duty demands and penalties imposed by the Department, emphasizing the significance of technical descriptions, industry norms, and legal precedents in determining duty liability for manufacturing activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>