<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 388 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting 80% of the unsupported freight expenditure claimed by the transportation company, subject to tax compliance verification. The Tribunal directed further examination of tax compliance issues related to the disallowed amount under sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3) for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 388 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting 80% of the unsupported freight expenditure claimed by the transportation company, subject to tax compliance verification. The Tribunal directed further examination of tax compliance issues related to the disallowed amount under sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3) for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>