<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 957 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation and dismissing the issue regarding payments to a firm owned by one of the managing trustees. However, the Tribunal remanded the issue of advances to another company for further examination and allowed the appeal concerning the investment in gold bullion, ruling it a violation of the relevant section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:47:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 957 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation and dismissing the issue regarding payments to a firm owned by one of the managing trustees. However, the Tribunal remanded the issue of advances to another company for further examination and allowed the appeal concerning the investment in gold bullion, ruling it a violation of the relevant section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>