https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170740 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation of Rs. 8,60,474 against the appellant, M/s. Ganapati Rolling Mills Pvt., and imposed penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Penalties of Rs. 20,000 each were also imposed on the Director and Manager of the company under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found the allegations of clandestine activities substantiated by consistent admissions and corroborative evidence, leading to the rejection of the appeals. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:46:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170740 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation of Rs. 8,60,474 against the appellant, M/s. Ganapati Rolling Mills Pvt., and imposed penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Penalties of Rs. 20,000 each were also imposed on the Director and Manager of the company under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found the allegations of clandestine activities substantiated by consistent admissions and corroborative evidence, leading to the rejection of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170740