<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 980 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that unabsorbed depreciation should be deducted before allowing deduction under section 10A, while unabsorbed business loss should be deducted only from the profit available after the section 10A deduction. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the profits of the special economic zone unit should not be included in computing the book profit under section 115JB of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 980 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that unabsorbed depreciation should be deducted before allowing deduction under section 10A, while unabsorbed business loss should be deducted only from the profit available after the section 10A deduction. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the profits of the special economic zone unit should not be included in computing the book profit under section 115JB of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>