<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1147 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170750</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT Credit and penalty under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Court set aside the order vacating the stay due to the expiry of the statutory period, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s discretion to consider the circumstances of each case. The appellant&#039;s contention of not being responsible for the delay in disposal was upheld, leading to the extension of the stay order. The Court directed prompt disposal of the appeal, highlighting that the decision did not restrict the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in future stay matters. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1147 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170750</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT Credit and penalty under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Court set aside the order vacating the stay due to the expiry of the statutory period, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s discretion to consider the circumstances of each case. The appellant&#039;s contention of not being responsible for the delay in disposal was upheld, leading to the extension of the stay order. The Court directed prompt disposal of the appeal, highlighting that the decision did not restrict the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in future stay matters. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>