<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 373 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld a duty demand of Rs. 7,28,92,253/- against the appellant company for alleged clandestine removal of Saria (TMT Bars) and unaccounted receipt of MS Ingots. The penalty on the company was also reduced. However, the duty demand of Rs. 16,38,63,265/- based on a power consumption ratio was set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 06:00:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 373 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld a duty demand of Rs. 7,28,92,253/- against the appellant company for alleged clandestine removal of Saria (TMT Bars) and unaccounted receipt of MS Ingots. The penalty on the company was also reduced. However, the duty demand of Rs. 16,38,63,265/- based on a power consumption ratio was set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>