<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 368 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260443</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court found that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to respond to the material considered before the order was passed. The court quashed the order dated 20.5.2014 and remitted the matter back to the Settlement Commissioner for fresh consideration, emphasizing that all legal contentions would be considered in the new proceedings. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 368 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260443</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court found that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to respond to the material considered before the order was passed. The court quashed the order dated 20.5.2014 and remitted the matter back to the Settlement Commissioner for fresh consideration, emphasizing that all legal contentions would be considered in the new proceedings. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>