<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 362 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260437</link>
    <description>Rejection of books under section 145(3) was found unjustified where no specific defect was shown in trading results, purchases, sales, or closing stock, and the accounts were otherwise audited and verifiable. Mere non-production or non-maintenance of a stock register did not, by itself, justify rejection of book results, particularly when additional evidence explained the earlier non-production and the directors&#039; dispute constituted sufficient cause. In the absence of incriminating material from search or other independent adverse evidence, the estimated trading addition based on alleged suppression of profit was unsustainable, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 05:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 362 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260437</link>
      <description>Rejection of books under section 145(3) was found unjustified where no specific defect was shown in trading results, purchases, sales, or closing stock, and the accounts were otherwise audited and verifiable. Mere non-production or non-maintenance of a stock register did not, by itself, justify rejection of book results, particularly when additional evidence explained the earlier non-production and the directors&#039; dispute constituted sufficient cause. In the absence of incriminating material from search or other independent adverse evidence, the estimated trading addition based on alleged suppression of profit was unsustainable, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>