<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 878 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the waiver of the pre-deposit condition of the duty demand, interest, and penalty in favor of the appellant. The decision was based on the consistent payment of excise duty on the final product, which had been accepted by the Department. The Tribunal held that if duty had been collected on the final product, Cenvat credit had to be allowed and could not be subsequently denied on the grounds that the process did not amount to manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 14:10:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 878 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the waiver of the pre-deposit condition of the duty demand, interest, and penalty in favor of the appellant. The decision was based on the consistent payment of excise duty on the final product, which had been accepted by the Department. The Tribunal held that if duty had been collected on the final product, Cenvat credit had to be allowed and could not be subsequently denied on the grounds that the process did not amount to manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>