<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>A Bill further to amend the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - To remove impracticability as decided in supreme court judgment Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod versus State of Maharashtra and another (Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=14590</link>
    <description>The Bill redefines &quot;a cheque in the electronic form&quot; to align with the Information Technology Act and confines territorial jurisdiction under section 138 to the court where the payee&#039;s presenting bank branch is situated. It requires subsequent complaints by the same payee against the same drawer to be tried before the same court, mandates transfer of multiple prosecutions to the designated court, and validates transfer of pending cases as if the new jurisdictional scheme had always prevailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:56:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>A Bill further to amend the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - To remove impracticability as decided in supreme court judgment Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod versus State of Maharashtra and another (Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=14590</link>
      <description>The Bill redefines &quot;a cheque in the electronic form&quot; to align with the Information Technology Act and confines territorial jurisdiction under section 138 to the court where the payee&#039;s presenting bank branch is situated. It requires subsequent complaints by the same payee against the same drawer to be tried before the same court, mandates transfer of multiple prosecutions to the designated court, and validates transfer of pending cases as if the new jurisdictional scheme had always prevailed.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:56:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=14590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>