<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 342 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that charges collected for electricity and water by the appellant cannot be considered as the value of services provided, only the commission received should be considered. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs for one issue and Rs. 5.35 lakhs for another to waive pre-deposit of the balance amount, with recovery stayed until compliance. Compliance verification was scheduled for 11/03/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 342 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that charges collected for electricity and water by the appellant cannot be considered as the value of services provided, only the commission received should be considered. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs for one issue and Rs. 5.35 lakhs for another to waive pre-deposit of the balance amount, with recovery stayed until compliance. Compliance verification was scheduled for 11/03/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>