<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 321 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260396</link>
    <description>In transfer pricing analysis under the transactional net margin method, comparability must rest on functional similarity and reliable data. Companies showing abnormal profit trends may be excluded where those figures do not reflect normal business conditions, and entities lacking adequate segmental data are not suitable comparables. On that basis, Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. was rejected because of wide margin fluctuations, and E-Infochip Bangalore Ltd. was rejected because its combined software and IT-enabled services segment lacked proper segmental disclosure. The arm&#039;s length price was therefore required to be recomputed after excluding those comparables, with the adjustment restored for fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 06:21:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 321 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260396</link>
      <description>In transfer pricing analysis under the transactional net margin method, comparability must rest on functional similarity and reliable data. Companies showing abnormal profit trends may be excluded where those figures do not reflect normal business conditions, and entities lacking adequate segmental data are not suitable comparables. On that basis, Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. was rejected because of wide margin fluctuations, and E-Infochip Bangalore Ltd. was rejected because its combined software and IT-enabled services segment lacked proper segmental disclosure. The arm&#039;s length price was therefore required to be recomputed after excluding those comparables, with the adjustment restored for fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>