<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi Sales Tax: Form ST-35 Rejection Overturned; Endorsement for 2000-01 Assessment Year Deemed Sufficient for Dealer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23285</link>
    <description>Rejection of ST-35 form - Delhi sales tax - There is nothing to show that the selling dealer (the assessee) could have known as to for which assessment year the specific form had been issued by the department. For his purposes, the endorsement on the top showing it to be a form pertaining to AY 2000-01 was sufficient. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:20:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi Sales Tax: Form ST-35 Rejection Overturned; Endorsement for 2000-01 Assessment Year Deemed Sufficient for Dealer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23285</link>
      <description>Rejection of ST-35 form - Delhi sales tax - There is nothing to show that the selling dealer (the assessee) could have known as to for which assessment year the specific form had been issued by the department. For his purposes, the endorsement on the top showing it to be a form pertaining to AY 2000-01 was sufficient. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:20:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>