<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Partial Violations of Section 80IB(10) Don&#039;t Justify Full Deduction Denial for Income Tax Act Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23282</link>
    <description>Pro-rata deduction u/s 80IB - merely because the assessee had violated the provisions of section 80IB(10)(c) of the Act in respect of two units i.e. row houses D-3 and D-4, the deduction under section 80IB(10) could not be denied in entirety. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:47:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Partial Violations of Section 80IB(10) Don&#039;t Justify Full Deduction Denial for Income Tax Act Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23282</link>
      <description>Pro-rata deduction u/s 80IB - merely because the assessee had violated the provisions of section 80IB(10)(c) of the Act in respect of two units i.e. row houses D-3 and D-4, the deduction under section 80IB(10) could not be denied in entirety. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:47:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>