https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170691 The court upheld the decision of the second appellate authority in a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State Information Officer under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The petitioner, a Naib Tahsildar, was not held responsible for providing information directly, as it pertained to other officials. The court found the penalty imposed on the petitioner to be justified, considering the petitioner's actions and providing an opportunity for defense. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the reasonableness of the second appellate authority's decision based on the evidence presented. en-us Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:47:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170691 The court upheld the decision of the second appellate authority in a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State Information Officer under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The petitioner, a Naib Tahsildar, was not held responsible for providing information directly, as it pertained to other officials. The court found the penalty imposed on the petitioner to be justified, considering the petitioner's actions and providing an opportunity for defense. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the reasonableness of the second appellate authority's decision based on the evidence presented. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170691