https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260380 The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order lacking in proper analysis and discussion, setting it aside and remanding the case for de-novo adjudication. The order did not adequately address the denial of cenvat credit for various services received by the appellant, including consultancy services from foreign providers, business support services, repair and maintenance services, and others. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner's handling of the matter and directed the disposal of appeals and stay applications, with instructions to inform the Chairman of the CBEC about the decision. en-us Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:07:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260380 The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order lacking in proper analysis and discussion, setting it aside and remanding the case for de-novo adjudication. The order did not adequately address the denial of cenvat credit for various services received by the appellant, including consultancy services from foreign providers, business support services, repair and maintenance services, and others. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner's handling of the matter and directed the disposal of appeals and stay applications, with instructions to inform the Chairman of the CBEC about the decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260380