<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260364</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions under Sections 68 and 69C. The decision was based on substantial documentary evidence proving the genuineness of transactions, which the Revenue failed to rebut. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in tax assessments and overturned the AO and Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s reliance on presumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:04:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260364</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions under Sections 68 and 69C. The decision was based on substantial documentary evidence proving the genuineness of transactions, which the Revenue failed to rebut. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in tax assessments and overturned the AO and Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s reliance on presumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>