<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 278 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee. The Tribunal upheld decisions on issues such as disallowance of bad debts and penalty to Stock Exchange, while remanding others like treatment of computer and software development expenditure for further examination. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and legal precedents in resolving the various issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 278 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee. The Tribunal upheld decisions on issues such as disallowance of bad debts and penalty to Stock Exchange, while remanding others like treatment of computer and software development expenditure for further examination. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and legal precedents in resolving the various issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>