<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 275 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the disallowance of commission payments to all four commission agents for the assessment year 2001-2002. The Tribunal found that the services provided were essential for the business operations, contradicting the lower authority&#039;s assertion of no services rendered. It was emphasized that such payments for essential services are allowable unless proven to be against public interest. The Tribunal deemed the basis for disallowance by the lower authorities unfounded and not supported by the facts of the case, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 275 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the disallowance of commission payments to all four commission agents for the assessment year 2001-2002. The Tribunal found that the services provided were essential for the business operations, contradicting the lower authority&#039;s assertion of no services rendered. It was emphasized that such payments for essential services are allowable unless proven to be against public interest. The Tribunal deemed the basis for disallowance by the lower authorities unfounded and not supported by the facts of the case, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>