https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170676 The court dismissed both petitions, upholding the decisions of the adjudicating authority, Commissioner (Appeals), and the revisional authority in rejecting the part rebate claim. The court emphasized the importance of verifying the authenticity of suppliers and transactions when claiming CENVAT credit. The petitioners failed to produce evidence to counter findings that invoices were fake and non-existent, leading to the denial of the rebate claim. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2015 12:59:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170676 The court dismissed both petitions, upholding the decisions of the adjudicating authority, Commissioner (Appeals), and the revisional authority in rejecting the part rebate claim. The court emphasized the importance of verifying the authenticity of suppliers and transactions when claiming CENVAT credit. The petitioners failed to produce evidence to counter findings that invoices were fake and non-existent, leading to the denial of the rebate claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170676