https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170682 The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the review petitions, but found no error apparent in the order under review. On that basis, it declined to reconsider the earlier Special Leave Petition orders and dismissed the review petitions. The order reflects the limited scope of review jurisdiction, which is confined to correcting apparent errors on the face of the record rather than reappreciating the merits. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:10:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170682 The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the review petitions, but found no error apparent in the order under review. On that basis, it declined to reconsider the earlier Special Leave Petition orders and dismissed the review petitions. The order reflects the limited scope of review jurisdiction, which is confined to correcting apparent errors on the face of the record rather than reappreciating the merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170682