<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 269 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260344</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the demand for service tax and interest while waiving penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for a Multi System Operator (MSO) service provider. The appellant&#039;s lack of awareness and reasonable cause for non-payment were considered, leading to relief under Section 80, despite the invocation of the extended period for tax liability by the Assistant Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 269 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260344</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the demand for service tax and interest while waiving penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for a Multi System Operator (MSO) service provider. The appellant&#039;s lack of awareness and reasonable cause for non-payment were considered, leading to relief under Section 80, despite the invocation of the extended period for tax liability by the Assistant Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>