https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260340 The judge set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules 2002. It was found that the appellants had no reason to believe the goods were liable for confiscation as the sugar cleared for export was processed with necessary documents and bond amount debited. The judge concluded that the appellants were not knowingly involved in any wrongdoing, leading to the penalties being overturned and the appeals allowed. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260340 The judge set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules 2002. It was found that the appellants had no reason to believe the goods were liable for confiscation as the sugar cleared for export was processed with necessary documents and bond amount debited. The judge concluded that the appellants were not knowingly involved in any wrongdoing, leading to the penalties being overturned and the appeals allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260340