<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 256 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2008-09. It found that Explanation 5 applied instead of Explanation 3, as the assessee had disclosed assets during a search and included them in the return of wealth. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer was not justified in imposing the penalty and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 256 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2008-09. It found that Explanation 5 applied instead of Explanation 3, as the assessee had disclosed assets during a search and included them in the return of wealth. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer was not justified in imposing the penalty and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>