<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 251 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260326</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC admitted the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order. The HC set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and directed reconsideration of the matter by the CIT(A) without formal admission of additional evidence. The ITAT was instructed to review the appeal on its merits, considering evidence presented before the CIT(A). Ultimately, the appeal favored the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 251 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260326</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC admitted the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order. The HC set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and directed reconsideration of the matter by the CIT(A) without formal admission of additional evidence. The ITAT was instructed to review the appeal on its merits, considering evidence presented before the CIT(A). Ultimately, the appeal favored the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>