<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to eliminate the provision for stock obsolescence/non-moving inventory from the assessee&#039;s financial statements to ensure comparability with other companies in a transfer pricing analysis. The Tribunal found the provision abnormal and extraordinary, excluding it for computing operating margins. Relying on precedent and the principle of making suitable adjustments for comparability, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to eliminate the provision for stock obsolescence/non-moving inventory from the assessee&#039;s financial statements to ensure comparability with other companies in a transfer pricing analysis. The Tribunal found the provision abnormal and extraordinary, excluding it for computing operating margins. Relying on precedent and the principle of making suitable adjustments for comparability, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>