<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 241 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260316</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment under section 147 was invalid as there was no failure to disclose material facts within four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed. The issues regarding disallowance under section 14A and depreciation on computer software were not extensively addressed due to the primary finding on the validity of the reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 241 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260316</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment under section 147 was invalid as there was no failure to disclose material facts within four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed. The issues regarding disallowance under section 14A and depreciation on computer software were not extensively addressed due to the primary finding on the validity of the reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>