<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 234 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the deletion of the addition confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the evidence and arguments presented, noting that the addition was not sustainable in the hands of the assessee based on the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision that no addition could be made in relation to alleged benami accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 234 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the deletion of the addition confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the evidence and arguments presented, noting that the addition was not sustainable in the hands of the assessee based on the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision that no addition could be made in relation to alleged benami accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>