https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170666 The court upheld the constitutional validity of appointing respondents 4 to 74 as Assistant Controllers of Imports and Exports through direct recruitment, validating the 75% direct recruits and 25% departmental promotees ratio. It affirmed the retrospective application of the 1962 rules and the seniority list, dismissing claims of unconstitutionality in relating back the seniority of direct recruits. The court found no discrimination in the recruitment ratio and deemed the appointment process reasonable, ultimately dismissing the petition and acknowledging the administrative confusion caused by ad hoc appointments. en-us Tue, 01 Nov 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170666 The court upheld the constitutional validity of appointing respondents 4 to 74 as Assistant Controllers of Imports and Exports through direct recruitment, validating the 75% direct recruits and 25% departmental promotees ratio. It affirmed the retrospective application of the 1962 rules and the seniority list, dismissing claims of unconstitutionality in relating back the seniority of direct recruits. The court found no discrimination in the recruitment ratio and deemed the appointment process reasonable, ultimately dismissing the petition and acknowledging the administrative confusion caused by ad hoc appointments. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Nov 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170666