https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170663 Territorial jurisdiction under clause 14 of the High Court (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 was held to depend on whether the cause of action arose wholly or partly within the notified Oudh areas, including where the impugned order was issued at Lucknow. The Court rejected any separate theory of jurisdiction divorced from the ordinary cause-of-action test and reaffirmed the earlier construction of clause 14. The Explanation to Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 did not alter that interpretation or justify denying jurisdiction. The contrary view was found erroneous, and the jurisdictional ruling was set aside. en-us Sun, 02 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:00:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170663 Territorial jurisdiction under clause 14 of the High Court (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 was held to depend on whether the cause of action arose wholly or partly within the notified Oudh areas, including where the impugned order was issued at Lucknow. The Court rejected any separate theory of jurisdiction divorced from the ordinary cause-of-action test and reaffirmed the earlier construction of clause 14. The Explanation to Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 did not alter that interpretation or justify denying jurisdiction. The contrary view was found erroneous, and the jurisdictional ruling was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 02 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170663