https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170660 A purchaser who takes an agreement to sell after a Section 4 acquisition notification acquires no enforceable title and cannot seek release of the land merely on parity, discrimination or government circulars. The article states that acquisition had already attained finality, any post-notification transfer was void against the State, and Article 14 could not be invoked to claim negative equality without a proper factual foundation showing lawful comparability. It also notes that release had to be sought before the competent authority, not granted directly by the writ court, and that circulars inconsistent with the acquisition law could not override the statute. The claimed release of land for a different use was therefore unsustainable. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170660 A purchaser who takes an agreement to sell after a Section 4 acquisition notification acquires no enforceable title and cannot seek release of the land merely on parity, discrimination or government circulars. The article states that acquisition had already attained finality, any post-notification transfer was void against the State, and Article 14 could not be invoked to claim negative equality without a proper factual foundation showing lawful comparability. It also notes that release had to be sought before the competent authority, not granted directly by the writ court, and that circulars inconsistent with the acquisition law could not override the statute. The claimed release of land for a different use was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170660