<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules 16% Interest on Unsecured Loans Reasonable; Rejects 14% Benchmark as Too Rigid u/s 40A.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23258</link>
    <description>Disallowance of interest u/s 40A - The unsecured borrowings by a commercial organisation like the assessee, on these facts, @ 16% interest seems to be reasonable. The benchmark @ 14% adopted by the ld. CIT(A), by taking fixed deposit interest rates of companies like MGF Limited and Rama Vision Ltd., cannot be applied in a rigid way. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:34:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:34:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules 16% Interest on Unsecured Loans Reasonable; Rejects 14% Benchmark as Too Rigid u/s 40A.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23258</link>
      <description>Disallowance of interest u/s 40A - The unsecured borrowings by a commercial organisation like the assessee, on these facts, @ 16% interest seems to be reasonable. The benchmark @ 14% adopted by the ld. CIT(A), by taking fixed deposit interest rates of companies like MGF Limited and Rama Vision Ltd., cannot be applied in a rigid way. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:34:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>