<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 229 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260304</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered the nature of services provided by the appellant, involving laying pipelines for water supply. It differentiated between services for commercial/industrial purposes and public utility. The appellant was directed to deposit specific amounts within a timeframe, with waivers and stays granted during the appeal process. The Tribunal excluded a substantial portion of the demand for pre-deposit, considering services not primarily related to commerce or industry. The appellant made out a prima facie case for laying pipelines for an Industrial Growth Centre, leading to specific directives on deposit amounts and stay against recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 229 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260304</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal considered the nature of services provided by the appellant, involving laying pipelines for water supply. It differentiated between services for commercial/industrial purposes and public utility. The appellant was directed to deposit specific amounts within a timeframe, with waivers and stays granted during the appeal process. The Tribunal excluded a substantial portion of the demand for pre-deposit, considering services not primarily related to commerce or industry. The appellant made out a prima facie case for laying pipelines for an Industrial Growth Centre, leading to specific directives on deposit amounts and stay against recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>