<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 227 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260302</link>
    <description>Under section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, liability must be assessed by reference to sales turnover of taxable goods, not purchase value. Where the dealer&#039;s sales turnover is below the statutory threshold, the assessing authority cannot invoke purchase value to fasten tax liability under that provision. On the admitted facts, the dealer&#039;s turnover remained below the limit, so the assessment lacked jurisdiction and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:24:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 227 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260302</link>
      <description>Under section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, liability must be assessed by reference to sales turnover of taxable goods, not purchase value. Where the dealer&#039;s sales turnover is below the statutory threshold, the assessing authority cannot invoke purchase value to fasten tax liability under that provision. On the admitted facts, the dealer&#039;s turnover remained below the limit, so the assessment lacked jurisdiction and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>