<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 223 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest on delayed payment of duty on supplementary invoices, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s liability under Section 11AB of the Act. Citing relevant legal provisions and precedents, including decisions of the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the order and rejected the appeal. The judgment highlighted the importance of complying with statutory provisions to prevent revenue loss and underscored the significance of amendments in duty recovery post-2001 and 2003.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 223 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest on delayed payment of duty on supplementary invoices, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s liability under Section 11AB of the Act. Citing relevant legal provisions and precedents, including decisions of the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the order and rejected the appeal. The judgment highlighted the importance of complying with statutory provisions to prevent revenue loss and underscored the significance of amendments in duty recovery post-2001 and 2003.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>